Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (1362)	10/24/2001 1:30:01 PM
From: John Sikora	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

Rich ,LTK, George, C'mon folks...let's not pollute this thread where we have someone like Zeev graciously sharing his amazingly accurate reads on the market and asking for nothing in return! There are plenty of threads to discuss such matters...Once again Zeev thanks a bunch for sharing... john

To: Rich1 who wrote (1362)	10/24/2001 2:08:25 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 99280

your right rich,it was another thread,back when you were recommending we kill them all,every man woman and child--just nuke'em off the face of the earth---my brief conversation with a "Nuke em"---<<To:thestockrider who wrote (92) From: Rich1 Wednesday, Sep 12, 2001 3:50 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206 You know what Harry Truman would have done????>> my reply<< To:Rich1 who wrote (96) From: LTK007 Wednesday, Sep 12, 2001 11:49 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206 Truman is not proud of what he did---it was estimated that if he did not do what he did,2million more allied soldiers would die to get a surrender.(he later fired MacArthur for wanting to use nuclear weapons in Korea) The war already ,for us,was 4 years old,and the enemy would never surrender. But you wimps,don't want any war,you just want to have a Nuclear Blast you can watch on your T.V. sets and then think how fuuuking brave you are--dirty cowards!!!!!Max>> his reply << To:LTK007 who wrote (127) From: Rich1 Thursday, Sep 13, 2001 6:12 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206 I am not an advocate of being a wimp... >> my reply <<To:Rich1 who wrote (137) From: LTK007 Thursday, Sep 13, 2001 10:34 AM Respond to of 206 wimps Nuke,because they have no balls to fight an honorable war."We never have to be couragous again,we just blow them up" is their motto. And watch the news reals of unspeakable horror and wave the american flag(that is the Nuke em's visionary mind)--o you are a wimp.Max >> and thus conversation ceased---point being "Nuke em" types are fundamental cowards of the lowest order.PaxMax ---p.s. i support our present policies in our war against terrorism and weapons of mass destruction--it is intelligent and well thought out. i posted this as i have gotten a couple PMs suggesting i am a passivist--which i am not. With that i bid adieu.