SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brendan W who wrote (13232)10/24/2001 4:21:30 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 78672
 
Spek, Wallace, Brendan: re. Enron:

Brendan, I've followed you into ENE. At current price the numbers (price/book, div yield, figures you gave) look attractive. With the analyst's uncommon "sell" rating issued and 75 million shares trading, I am hoping most people who want out of this stock are getting out, and the selling pressure will abate.

Reflecting on what my business colleagues told me about Enron, I believe I mis-characterized it. It wasn't their point that the Enron managers were just lean & mean. They were MEAN and lean. As in nasty and rough mean - even when they didn't have to be. Apparently carries over to the way they treat shareholders too, as I now see. (cf: Motley Fool ref. in Yahoo news)

The company is too big and its people too focused not to be a big force in energy. 18 months from now, the top managers' and BOD's shabby performance will have faded in the background -- maybe. And the stock should/could/might recover.

Only a small bet for me though until the the stock steadies and/or I can assess better.

Paul S.



To: Brendan W who wrote (13232)10/24/2001 4:28:22 PM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 78672
 
ACGL - value players should look carefully at today's deal, a $750 million infusion to set up a Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary. I am long from 18 and holding so far since reinsurance should be a license to print money next year.