Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skywatcher who wrote (195489)	10/24/2001 4:08:08 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You really think the Chinese Embassy bombing was a mistake?

To: Skywatcher who wrote (195489)	10/24/2001 4:33:35 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Chris, when a government sanctions and harbors a group that has attacked and declared war on the U.S. they are doing so with the responisbility for the safety of their own people in their hands. NOBODY likes civilian deaths. The United States of America has THE MOST accurate weapons in the world (do you even agree with that?) and we are trying our best to have ZERO civilian deaths. We also have offered to stop if they want rethink their position on giving up Al Quida and its supporters. They have not. What part of this do you not agree with? I would like to see your true views in writing. Your cryptic comments make it LOOK like you are for the Taliban. That's how I read them anyway.

To: Skywatcher who wrote (195489)	10/24/2001 4:34:43 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

The examples you cited were 100% on target. Those examples show the performance of the weapon to be 100%. They hit the point targeted. The hospital was caused by a miss entry of least significant lat and long data. The Embassy was the site of radio transmissions of the bad guys. That's why it was targeted and hit accurately. Accuracy is about when the bomb does not hit the intended programmed in target point. You really don't understand how measure anything. Well let us say your methods are 100% wrong. Typical of the technology ignorant vacant liberal mind. tom watson tosiwmee