SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : AMAT Off-Topic Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (18)10/24/2001 7:04:28 PM
From: Cary Salsberg  Respond to of 786
 
RE: "250k dead in bio/chem attack in multiple cities and we have a chance to get BL and 5000 maniacs in a cave without collateral damage and little radiation."

Of course, go ahead, nuke them and then find a mouse to put a bell around the cat's neck!

Why do you keep repeating an unrealistic scenario? Do you think people able to kill 250K will make life that easy for you?



To: michael97123 who wrote (18)10/24/2001 8:38:07 PM
From: Jerome  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 786
 
Suppose the Nuke response was flawed??? Now what...?

We expend a few nuke to eliminate Bin Laden only to discover that he was not there to get his radiation treatment. Now What...start another course of therapy?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't move around very much so the bomb only had to find a stationary target. Bin Laden may not be so co-operative.

Regards, Jerome



To: michael97123 who wrote (18)10/24/2001 10:09:28 PM
From: Math Junkie  Respond to of 786
 
"I may stop responding to those i consider unreasonable and terminally naive."

How would you like it if I started calling you "unreasonable and terminally naive"? Is this your idea of how to carry on a civil discussion?