SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ONI Systems Corp. (ONIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (128)10/30/2001 3:26:38 PM
From: Maverick  Respond to of 227
 
SSB: Cash increased to $5.00/sh at $684mm
ONI Systems (ONIS)#
ONIS: 3Q Results Largely In Line With Our 1S (Buy, Speculative)
Forecasts Mkt Cap: $879.1 mil.
October 23, 2001 SUMMARY
* ONI reported results in line with the prerelease
TELECOMMUNICATIONS and our forecast with revenues in line at $40.2mm,
EQUIPMENT representing a 41% Q-Q decline and with an EPS loss
B. Alexander Henderson of $0.19 that missed our forecast by $0.01.
* Gross margins held up relatively well given the
revenue decline. They fell to 37%, only down 180
Timothy Anderson basis points Q-Q despite management's insistence
that of a continuing shift toward lower-margin
chassis sales relative to line cards.
Daryl Armstrong * Management insists trailing activity continues to
increase and they insist their relationship with
current customers and key prospective customers
remains strong and even improving.
* Cash increased to $5.00/sh at $684mm, DSOs ramped
dramatically in the qtr, reaching 142 days from 88
in 2Q. Another $50mm avail. in working accts.
* We continue to worry about the outlook given the
capex environment, but believe the company has the
cash position to survive through this downturn.

ONI Systems reported 3Q results that were largely in line with our forecasts.
The Q-Q declines represented in the report underscore the difficult
environment in which carriers operate. The capex forecast for 2002 continues
to deteriorate with almost daily downward revisions by service providers. In
fact, we are now forecasting a 28%-29% decline in 2002 Capex. Within this
backdrop, we expect it to be a difficult exercise for any optical company to
show momentum. Having said this, ONI does have some positive points in its
favor.
* Cash Is King And ONI's Cash Increased Sharply In The Quarter. First, its
cash position, exceeding $600 million, suggests that it should not need to
worry about near-term liquidity issues and at $5 per share helps support
the valuation. Additionally, we estimate there's another $50 million in
working accounts to come as inventories and receivables right size.
* Trial Activity Continues To Increase At A Robust Pace--Strong Position With
Customers And Prospects. Second, ONI insists its continuing to see strong
new trial growth and persistent strength in its working relationships with
its key customers and key prospective customers. ONI also insists it
hasn't lost business to competitors causing the down draft rather the
programs were delayed or downsized. ONI strongly believes its competitive
position continues to improve.
* ILEC Deployments Getting Closer. Management continues to believe that ILEC
deployments are still likely to occur in the calendar 2002 timeframe,
albeit likely in the 2H of the year and ONI should have completed the
OSMINE process necessary to entertain playing within this arena.
Net-net, we continue to believe in the long-term positioning in the company
but still harbor concerns relative to how rapidly the company can rebound in
the face of an extremely harsh operating environment. We see the company as
well positioned at Qwest (Q, 1M rated by Jack Grubman--$16.11). It looks
like SBC (SBC#, 3M--$41.40) has lined up with Nortel (NT, 2H--$5.79) and
Verizon (VZ, 1M rated by Jack Grubman--$51.1) with Lucent (LU#, 2H--$6.90)
and Nortel. We haven't heard any specific indications of BellSouth working
with ONI. We do not think ONI won out in the Worldcom (WCOM#, 1M rated by
Jack Grubman--$12.99) account , but there is good indications of penetration
at a number of PTTs. Regardless, the Qwest relationship looks strong and we
think this is sufficient to produce a solid ramp in 2H.
ONI Posts Revenues That Came In Marginally Under Consensus Expectations. ONI
posted revenues of $40.2 million, representing a 41% Q-Q decline, in line
with our forecast. Consensus revenue expectations for the vendor was $44.9
million. ONI classifies its customers into five categories and we believe
their revenue contribution was as follows:
* CLECs: We believe these revenues came in at around $18.9 million, down 13%
Q-Q.
* IXC: Revenues from this category came in at $12.5 million, down 59% Q-Q.
* ILECs:ILEC-related revenues came in at $2.4 million, down 73% Q-Q.
* ISPs/Utilities: These two categories provided a total of $6.4 million, down
14% Q-Q.
Management noted that 3 of their customers provided over 10% of revenues and
17 of their customers reordered equipment in the quarter. This compares to
3Q 2001, when the company also had three 10% customers and 19 customers
ordering in 3Q 2001.
ONI Continues To Add Customers In The Quarter. The company reported they
added three customers in the quarter, increasing the total customer base to
27. The vendor added an IXC, ISP/ASP, and ILEC customer in the quarter.
Management also reiterated their expectation that the year-end customer count
should come in at 28 to 30 customers. Management expects to add another 2-3
customers by the end of 2001 bringing the total to 28-30, in line with
revised guidance but down previous expectations of 32-34 customers by year
end.
ONI's customers are classified as follows:
CUSTOMER 3Q01 2Q01 1Q01 4Q00
TYPE
IXC 7 6 5 4
CLEC 10 10 10 7
ISP/ASP 4 3 3 2
Utilities 2 2 2 2
ILEC/PTT 4 3 1 1
TOTAL 27 24 21 16
Geographic Segmentation Remains Stable. The company's geographic breakdown
remained relatively stable in the quarter. While international growth
opportunities appear strong, management noted Europe and Asia continue to
remain the most price sensitive regions, with certain international competing
very aggressively on pricing in Asia Pacific. below is a summary of ONI's
geographic segmentation.
REGION 3Q01 2Q01 1Q01
North America 67% 71% 71%
Asia 22% 21% 19%
Europe 11% 8% 10%
Gross Margins Remain Stable Despite Revenue Falloff. Although revenues came
down 41% Q-Q, gross margins only fell 180 basis points sequentially to 37%.
This performance is perplexing given that management insists that mix
continues to move toward lower-margin chassis relative to line cards.
Management attributes the margin performance to better efficiency, materials
management, and a stable pricing environment. On a macro level, management
asserted they only see two competitors consistently, Nortel and Ciena (CIEN,
3H--$16.71), and that neither resorted to predatory pricing strategies in the
quarter. In terms of the forward outlook management expects margins to stay
roughly at the same level in the 4Q period. In the quarter, operating losses
were $29 million, compared to our $27.8 million forecast as the company
continued to invest diligently on the R&D and SG&A front.
ONI's OSMINE Certification Efforts Seem On Track. Management reaffirmed their
expectation that they should receive OSMINE certification for their transport
products in the 4Q timeframe. They also noted that they had added the
ONLINE2500 to their certification efforts. In total, the company spent
roughly $3 million on these efforts in the quarter.
Cash Position Remains Strong But DSOs Ramp Dramatically. ONI's cash
position stood at $684 million. Management believes this position is large
enough to fund them for four years, even if the current downturn lasts for
another four years.
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
ONI Systems is the only next-generation optical systems company to come
public to date that is focused exclusively on the metro optical markets. ONI
s products were purpose built for the metro arena and we believe as such have
a competitive advantage to products from its nearest competitors in Nortel,
Lucent, CIENA, and Sycamore, which have generalized solutions for the metro
and long-haul arenas.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (128)11/1/2001 6:04:14 PM
From: Maverick  Respond to of 227
 
SSB:metro market will be the first segment to see a reacceleration in spending

November 1, 2001 COMPANY DESCRIPTION
ONI Systems is the only next-generation optical systems
TELECOMMUNICATIONS company to come public to date that is focused exclusively
EQUIPMENT on the metro optical markets. ONI s products were built
B. Alexander specifically for the metro arena and we believe as such
Henderson have a competitive advantage to products from its nearest
competitors such as Nortel, Lucent, CIENA, and Sycamore,
which have generalized solutions for the metro and
long-haul arenas.
INVESTMENT THESIS
The capex forecast for 2002 continues to deteriorate with almost daily
downward revisions by service providers. We are forecasting a 28%-29%
decline in 2002 capex. Within this backdrop, we expect it to be a difficult
exercise for any optical company to show momentum. However, we believe the
metro market will be the first segment to see a reacceleration in spending
and ONI is the best positioned company targeting this opportunity. Many of
the IXCs are shifting spending from the long haul segment into the metro and
regional markets in order to build out their systems to offer end to end
services. ONI's equipment is the most adept in the marketplace to enable
these advanced services and enable the service providers to deliver
additional revenue and profit opportunities. Net-net, we continue to believe
in the long-term positioning in the company, but harbor concerns relative to
how rapidly the company can rebound in the face of an extremely harsh
operating environment.RECENT RESULTS
ONI Systems reported 3Q results that were largely in line with our forecasts.
The Q-Q declines represented in the report underscore the difficult
environment in which carriers operate. ONI posted revenues of $40.2 million,
representing a 41% Q-Q decline, in line with our forecast. Consensus revenue
expectations for the vendor was $44.9 million. However, gross margins only
fell 180 basis points sequentially to 37%. This performance is perplexing
given that management insists that mix continues to move toward lower-margin
chassis relative to line cards. Management attributes the margin performance
to better efficiency, materials management, and a stable pricing environment.
Operating losses were $29 million, compared to our $27.8 million forecast as
the company continued to invest diligently on the R&D and SG&A front. ONI's
cash position stands at $684 million. Management believes this position is
large enough to fund them for four years, even if the current situation were
to last that long.
ONI added three customers in the quarter, including an IXC, an ISP/ASP, and
an ILEC, increasing the total customer base to 27. Management expects to add
another 2-3 customers by the end of 2001 bringing the total to 28-30, in line
with revised guidance but down previous expectations of 32-34 customers by
year end. Management continues to believe that ILEC deployments are still
likely to occur in the calendar 2002 timeframe, albeit likely in the 2H of
the year at which point ONI should have completed the OSMINE process
necessary to compete within this arena.
On the competitive front, management asserted they only see two competitors
consistently, Nortel and Ciena, and that neither resorted to predatory
pricing strategies in the quarter. ONI insists it continues to see strong
new trial growth and persistent strength in its working relationships with
key existing and prospective customers. ONI also insists it has not lost
business to competitors rather that programs were delayed or downsized. ONI
strongly believes its competitive position continues to improve.
The company's geographic breakdown remained relatively stable in the quarter.
While international growth opportunities appear strong, management noted
Europe and Asia continue to remain the most price sensitive regions, with
certain international competing very aggressively on pricing in Asia Pacific.
VALUATION
Using a price to sales valuation metric, ONI Systems trades at a discount to
Ciena, Corvis and Sycamore. While Corvis and Sycamore trade at approximately
10x CY02E sales, ONI and CIENA trade closer to 3x CY02E sales. From a
valuation perspective, this is misleading as shares of ONI are supported by
$5 per share in cash on the balance sheet. Similarly, Corvis and Sycamore
trade close to their cash values of $2 and $4 per share respectively.RISKS
ONI is up against very strong competition from well-funded competitors.
Nortel, Lucent, and Cisco are strong, serious competitors. Attaining and
sustaining a competitive advantage against these players will likely prove
challenging to the best of companies. With technology changes occurring at a
breakneck pace, the larger competitors have a better window to see more new
and emerging technology and could have an advantage in either garnering
component availability or in purchasing the supplier outright. This
represents a threat to the sustainability of ONI's position. We think the
the technology in ONI's line is strong enough to weather these changes.
However, we also think investors need to keep a close eye on the changing
landscape.