Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (1449)	10/24/2001 10:43:40 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 99280

Zeev BYE ! Will now only post update on Stock Attack II thread Subject 50783 Larry Dudash PS: This thread deleted:

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (1449)	10/24/2001 10:43:54 PM
From: ALTERN8	Respond to of 99280

au contraire 3rd time's the charm. finance.yahoo.com^N225&d=c&k=c4&t=5d moneycentral.msn.com

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (1449)	10/25/2001 2:48:25 AM
From: dwayanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

...May 22 to late August and count the times we stayed for a solid week not much above the 50 DMA, ... 50 DMA ? I make that about 2 solid months last April thru early June plus a week in July and a couple of days in August, (2 solid weeks last January, and not at all in Sept 1998 or Oct/Nov/Dec 1987). Exp. MA gave about the same thing. Am I looking at the right thing, or am I missing the point? It makes good common sense that a hold above the 50 dma would then be a major influence on the depth of a December retest ("you can't con an honest man, only a greedy one"), but I'm looking for more rigorous reasoning if possible. - Dway Side Note: $VXN is now at the bottom of the post-WTC channel (9/25-present), FWIW. Ditto $VIX .