Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (315)	10/25/2001 4:10:00 PM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

GNG is a dandy, but let's compare it to another dandy, NGT. GNG at 60, has a US$7.0 MC - US$ 1.6 cash= US$ 5.4 million enterprise value vs. US$1.1 million EV for NGT. Both are strong Sierra Madre prospects, but NGT has had US$30 million drilling already done, has established a high grade zone of 1,163,000 oz @ 3.16 g, with initial work complete on numerous other targets. GNG: we are still awaiting their very first holes. NGT suffering from PDG reject stigma? PDG is giving up (all the hallmarks of a company ready to merge), that's apparent from today's Getchell decision. On Salamandra, PDG exploration chief was quoted as saying, "I understand why we let LC go, and certainly Donlin Creek, but Salamandra? Will prove to be a mistake. Shouldn't have done it." Just look at the cross sections, and you will see what he's talking about. If this was a dud, PDG would have quit after $5 million, not $30 million. I already own 750,000 shares, look out, get out of my way, I'm buying more!