Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (18111)	10/25/2001 5:25:29 PM
From: The Freep	Respond to of 209892

May I just say how very happy I am that I posted my oh-so-keen readings last night. . . and how pleased I am that others shared my view. <g> Next! If we be in a 3 here, seems like we've still got more up to go in this wave, yes? And if we're not in a 3. . . anyone got a good idea where we are in a medium picture sense? It smells a little like a breakout. . . but we've certainly smelled that before. EDIT: I suppose one option is that this is wave 5 of the whole move from the bottom, having begun from the low on the 19th. This would mean that wave 1 was longer than 3, but 3 is still longer than 5 here (with about 60+ points to spare, I think). Wave 1 is odd looking in this scenario. But Shack -- is this what you were talking about when asking me why I thought this was the whole wave 4? As in, this whole up move could just be the start of some bigger formation? signed, confused in LA