SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (60305)10/25/2001 5:24:03 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Petz, you know how these things go. If you make the claims, show the numbers. I no longer care to hear bullsh!t AMDroid claims about Pentium 4 performance. We all know it varies by a wide margin, but most people prefer questioning claims like yours that say that the fastest Pentium 4 loses to the value line Celeron. I already showed a few instances where the Celeron looses to a 1.5GHz Pentium 4 with SDRAM. Where are yours that show a 1.7GHz Pentium 4 with RDRAM losing to the Celeron (not to mention the 2.0GHz SDRAM combination)?

wanna_bmw



To: Petz who wrote (60305)10/25/2001 5:30:43 PM
From: dale_laroyRespond to of 275872
 
>A 1.2 GHz celeron certainly would beat a1.7 GHz P4, and probably a 2 GHz P4 on PC133<

Only if by a 1.2 GHz Celeron you mean a Tualatin with 512KB L2 cache.

edit:

Oops, didn't notice you attached the PC133 to the P4.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News