SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TGPTNDR who wrote (60317)10/25/2001 5:53:51 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
TGPTNDR, Re: "What's the difference, except for the name, between the Pentium III Tulation 1.1G of October 1 and the Celeron 1.1G of October 2?"

The 1.1GHz Pentium III used the Coppermine core, not the Tualatin core. Additionally, the 1.1GHz Celeron also uses the Coppermine core. 1.2GHz is the only speed where it uses the Tualatin core. The 1.1GHz Celeron differs from that short-lived 1.1GHz Pentium III by having 128KB of L2 cache, as opposed to 256KB. Both were at 100MHz. The 1.2GHz Pentium III and 1.2GHz Celeron differ by the front side bus speed, the former being at 133MHz and the latter being at 100MHz.

What's the difference, besides that? It is all just a name, and marketing, from my perspective. However, if you want to be consistent, when Intel talks about a Pentium III cross-over, they mean the product that they call Pentium III, which excludes similar Celeron branded parts.

wanna_bmw



To: TGPTNDR who wrote (60317)10/25/2001 7:25:50 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
So the P-III isn't dying they are just going to call it a (tualatin) Celeron. With 256k L2? So it's really a P-III?

This will not be a bad chip by any means but the public won't get it...again.
Businesses might though...

Jim