Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (35476)	10/25/2001 7:49:48 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

What are you suggesting would 'help' regarding ... ... military prisoners-of-war who happen to be hypothetically yours and/or Rambi's children that is different from the past 60 years? Or 'captives.' I'm not relating your question to ... anything, actually. You want these 'towel heads,' as RWEs like to describe them, in custody/prison, to be physically tortured, by U.S. Federal law, in order to obtain information? What do you WANT? Laws supporting physical torture of suspects of terrorist crime-related activities to obtain information? Here's another hypothetical: Let's say that your son somehow or other, through no fault of your own as his or her father, decided to emulate the Timothy McVeigh 'role model.' Better yet, let's assume that some other young man or woman blew up something in the U.S. and your son or daughter was a suspect. Mistakenly so. Innocent. Just a matter of circumstance that they were 'fingered' as suspects in some horrendous crime. Would you also then support physical torture as a legalized method of 'intimidation?' bia