Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : John, Mike & Tom's Wild World of Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Johnson who wrote (2542)	10/26/2001 1:34:53 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Respond to of 2850

You omitted the beginning of the post you site. It started with this: “Rich & Steve: With the demise of this thread I tried to see what has occurred. All I can really see is this exchange, which occurred early on September 11 which ended by 11AM. I do plan on using this for future reference. I don’t want to be like Johnson who only cuts pieces that support his position. It appears Rich started it in a response to my post that the WTC collapsed.” THIS IS A CORRECT STATEMENT. I IDENTIFIED THE EXCHANGES THAT LED TO THE DEMISE OF THE THREAD. To you it implies (as you’ve just stated) I support Steve Lee. This is YOUR OPINION . You did not say it was your opinion but instead made a false accusation, “Seems Lamb supports a poster that antagonizes Americans about their outrage over the WTC disaster” as if it was a fact. Steve Lee and Rich1 both antagonized Americans with their banter on the thread. I didn’t give an opinion one-way or the other. I understood where both were coming from. You proved my point. You can’t support your accusation & your trying to misdirect my response to your false statement. Let me be perfectly clear in my apology. KISS MY ROYAL IRISH AMERICAN ASS