SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skywatcher who wrote (196304)10/26/2001 1:43:27 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Hey CC. Are you cheering for the Taliban?

Wouldn't it seem that if "those making the decisions" were targeting civilians there would be hundreds of thousands dead by now?

Have you proposed an alternative to destroying Al Quaida and the Taliban? Do you propose leaving them alone?

Please post it... Really tying to understand your mindset.



To: Skywatcher who wrote (196304)10/26/2001 2:19:06 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
The bombing of the Chinese embassy, rather the structure itself, was certainly on purpose. The US military was unaware that its intelligence was outdated and that the Chinese currently occupied the facility. That is fact. I know it doesn't square with your petty, partisan, whining, anti-American, demolib pinhead view of the world, but its a fact nevertheless.....

JLA



To: Skywatcher who wrote (196304)10/26/2001 2:23:45 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
They probably bombed the Red Cross place because of this:
" The Taliban had previously parked military vehicles close to that building to shield themselves"
according to CNN.
Three kids were killed, but shouldn't they have been stopped from being there i.e. close to a previously bombed location? There has never been a war where civilians weren't killed, this one is no exception.