Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mu Gamma Lambda -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (9778)	10/26/2001 4:06:35 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 10077

what I see with CEFT is that after forming somewhat of a sloppy Bullcat (spread TT followed by a DT), it broke the DB and couldn't rally above the old highs. Stockcharts identifies some things as low poles that I would never identify as such. But I think that Atin is going by strict definitions.

To: Rich1 who wrote (9778)	10/26/2001 7:54:40 PM
From: Atin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10077

The problem is that DWA's chart is using incorrect data so their chart is wrong (happens to the best of them, datafeeds are not always 100%). There was a reversal on 06/29/01 when the chart fell from the 28 box down to 25 (the low on 06/29/01 was 24.975 according to Nasdaq.com). This was reversed back on 07/02/91 when we went back above 28. DWA's chart doesn't show the column of Os and therefore doesn't have a double bottom break that fell by 3 boxes and then reversed more than 50%, the definition of a low pole reversal. -Atin