To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (10889 ) 10/27/2001 9:23:34 PM From: Moominoid Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559 The market storms up and there's no end to bad news - is this not an example of a cognitive dissonance? Except if it's mewho does not get it. Probably the idea (in the This is why I use technical analysis and Soros' ideas and so am very long and leveraged.Re "havel havelim..." what about "vanitas vanitatum..." Got it. I think I misquoted the other one. Bit like these imaginary Nostradamus Quatrains. But the meaning was the same in this case, just the wording different.The author...was he small, thin, mouse-like,restless... or fat, slow-moving, cool (thanks to the peacock-feathers fan, powered by slaves provided by the queen of Shaba...). Did he sleep late or did he get up before the first cock and tried to figure it all out (...look at all those stars above Jerushalaim...) There seem to be at least two or three authors of the book of Kohelet. The main text which starts with "Ani, Kohelet, hayiti melekh 'al yisrael..." "I , Kohelet, was king over Israel", I imagine was written as a fictionally dramatized piece of philosophy in say 200BC +/-. He is just pretending to be king for effect. Imagining what it might have been like to be Solomon. The main clue is that the language seems very late almost that of the Mishna or the 15 Psalms of Ascent (Shirei HaMa'alot). Also he might not even intend to be Solomon from "harbei mi-kol she-hayu lefanei be-rushalayim" "more than any of those that were before me in Jerusalem" (2:7). The only Jewish king before him in that city would be his father David, unless he is counting the Canaanite kings before him... I imagine this Bin-Laden like character sitting on a rug with parchment on a low stand in front of him <g>. In a cool stone domed house crowded among the walls of Jerusalem. Maybe like Bin-Laden he was the son of a wealthy Helenistic family who while taking some of the money rejected the decadence. Wrote in Hebrew but had read or heard the Greek philosophers. The first paragraph of 11 verses seems almost like a precis that was added on. It reminds me of those movies where there is some action at the beginning and then the title appears and some names of the actors and the action cuts to the real story. The last chapter or two look more like the Book of Proverbs. And then from 12:9 on there is what is clearly added as a conclusion which tries to limit the heretical interpretations of the book or even reverse them. David