Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (60637)	10/27/2001 2:11:27 PM
From: milo_morai	Respond to of 275872

The Athlon XP 1.33Mhz 1500+ would have made the 2000 look bad :o) TYFT URL. M

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (60637)	10/27/2001 2:24:57 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Pravin: Looks like the P4 performance myth is now being exposed...INTC's only response now is continuance of the repetitive cycles of P4 price reductions until P4 price/performance attains a realistic level...It's any body's guess as to what realistic P4 pricing is but given its unproven track record vs. Athy's 2 year enviable track record, one might argue that P4/Athy XP price parity might even be rather generous...

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (60637)	10/27/2001 4:59:03 PM
From: dale_laroy	Respond to of 275872

>This chart clearly shows that the Athon is much better optimized (or at least relatively more efficient) for Windows XP than the P4 is.< Are you sure it isn't that Windows XP is much better optimized for Athlon than P4?