Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7792)	10/27/2001 7:36:20 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 281500

Who cares?? in a 2-party system with two chambers and additionally a president the main point is anyway to avoid that the same party has the power in all institutions. And luckily it is possible to switch parties if mistakes happen, for all institutions but the president?? Ilmarinen I still remember when I understood why this great something-horse-something senator always jumps majority horses when needed (the committees), as well as how districts must be designed to achieve some kind of proportional representation although proportional representation is something ones should not even mention. (one might be disqualified in a blink, with efficient witch-hunt, like that something- something women for the administration of Billy boy) No wonder USA has demanded most aspiring democracies not to adopt the 2-party system, including germany after ww2. Now what is the problem of the Israeli election and gvmnt forming system??? Tyranny of the majority, the minority, or the party lists?? No Consensus and Continuity mechanisms?? Sorry for stepping into the twilight zone of all the unmentionables.. (there are some good explanations)