Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (60681)	10/28/2001 1:28:06 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Paul: Intel NEVER EVER had net income of $10 Billion/year - so how could it possibly DECLINE by over $10 Billion? Yoiu and Numbered Dan make up the AMDroid New Hallucinations of Accounting (ANHA) to crate phony baloney arguments about Intel's income - all the while IGNORING AMD's LOSSES andIntel NEVER EVER had net income of $10 Billion/year - so how could it possibly DECLINE by over $10 Billion? Paul, Paul, paul...I know it's difficult to comprehend a negative change for INTC in one year of $10 BILLION in net income...I have trouble enough myself attempting to rationalize the enormity of the change and I'm not an INTC investor...I mean how can such a behemoth turn south at such an alarming rate...Hardly time enough to pull the "chute"...But all the same, denial doesn't change the history...Anyway check the y2000 annual statement and note INTC net income is published as $10.535 billion... (You really should be a little more thorough in your research before you make such revealing statements as those above...I'd have thought better of a phd grad... but perhaps they missed a letter in the designation.Perhaps it's a ph..u..d degree that was bestowed upon you...) Be sure to let us know what INTC's net income in y2000 was if it wasn't $10.535 billion...(Imagine, a $10 BILLLION net income descent in only one year...and P4 still not out of chronic care...)