Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (133784)	10/28/2001 2:46:43 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

>You don't have to concern your self about my honesty, HJ. Bill, I've never concerned myself about your honesty, it was just all about your hyperbole. Hyperbole=extravagant exaggeration used in a figure of speech.

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (133784)	10/29/2001 7:00:22 AM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 164684

Aborting self-respect worldnetdaily.com Is it a good thing that we are paying our U.N. dues? I don't think so. In fact, I was one of the people in the Reagan administration who crafted the policy that withheld our contributions from the United Nations. The U.N. is an organization that reaches into the pockets of the working people of this country in order to put our money into the pockets of the rich people in developing countries. The policy we developed in the Reagan years in response to this corrupt waste was to withhold those dollars until the United Nations reformed its corrupt practices and ceased its opposition to the free enterprise approaches that could actually help poor countries around the world achieve economic well being. I think we should continue to withhold our dues today because the organization has not responded and has not reformed. Until it does, we ought to stand firm in our position that we won't take the hard-earned money of the American people and toss it away to international bureaucrats who are generally interested in doing nothing but maintaining their own comfort and security. But while the material waste and corruption that go on at the U.N. are reason enough to withhold our support, the Clinton green light for American funding of international abortionist activism epitomizes the real evil that the U.N. too often represents. I have called Bill Clinton a moral thermonuclear bomb, because of the profound damage he has done to the moral character of the American people, and particularly to our children, by the example he sets of moral degradation and self-disrespect. The return of America to the U.N. fold means that the Clinton bomb is going global. Much of the world still languishes in conditions of extreme material deprivation and suffering. But the global, if still uneven, triumph of entrepreneurial economics -- economic liberty -- that is culminating in our lifetime will dramatically improve the material condition especially of the poor. In fact, there has never been a time when the substantial alleviation of physical human suffering and want in the world was more immediately attainable. The WTO demonstrators in the streets of Seattle are right to suspect the anti-democratic and tyrannical ambitions of the global managers in the international bureaucracy. The World Trade Organization is the bid for power of global socialism, not economic liberty. But the demonstrators are wrong in failing to see that a truly free global marketplace will benefit precisely the billions of people who will raise themselves to lives of material dignity as soon as they are given the chance to do so. The material prosperity possible in the next century will arise not from "managed" global trade, but from the decline of government interference with the efforts of people all over the world to build better lives through economic initiatives over which they retain control and responsibility.

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (133784)	10/31/2001 7:18:09 PM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Bill, I think its only a matter of time before they put you on jail. The question is under what name will you use this time? >The complaint further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the Underwriters on the offering had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which those Underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of IPO shares issued in connection with the Intraware IPO; siliconinvestor.com