SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (131531)10/28/2001 5:47:59 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 436258
 
Public support will last only long as casualties are low. It will vary directly with the flow of body bags. And it will plunge if a draft is introduced. Thre is no huge surge of people rushing to enlist.



To: KyrosL who wrote (131531)10/28/2001 6:47:58 PM
From: Tommaso  Respond to of 436258
 
One of the magnificent things about American military commanders has been their reluctance to send soldiers into hopeless combat situations. There are exceptions, but a stinginess in the expenditure of lives and bodies is wholly admirable. The Gulf War was the most incredible example; fewer troops were lost than one might have expected on a war games exercise.

But in comparison with almost all other armies in World War II, American commanders were not enthusiastic about sending young men to be mutilated or killed.

I think most Americans are willing to give the military a little more leeway in figuring out what to do next.



To: KyrosL who wrote (131531)10/28/2001 9:19:37 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
re. large scale ground war.... from where, Iran?? LOL, everyone is too wimpy, and once winter sets in and it's obvious that Afgan civilian losses will dwarf WTC deaths, we'll have no support whatsoever... JMO.

DAK