Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Homeland Security -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (177)	10/28/2001 7:09:35 PM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 827

That makes sense, and might explain how humans managed to domesticate and breed animals, despite the existence of anthrax.

To: RocketMan who wrote (177)	10/28/2001 7:16:22 PM
From: Jill	Respond to of 827

So look at the contradictions: All people w/ cutaneous anthrax should stay on antibiotics for 60 days. Supposed reason: they "could've" inhaled it and could get inhalational anthrax so... ??? Those who worked with raw wool and got easily treated cutaneous anthrax "could've" inhaled it too...they were given 10 days of abx. I still believe they are not being completely honest about how its been weaponized. Or they may indeed understand that finely milled spores require far less for inoculation. Something doesn't fit.