SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: muzosi who wrote (60773)10/29/2001 1:36:45 AM
From: bacchus_iiRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Because ...

1- Only members have the ignore feature

2- It's like abusive commercial ... it's tired people but it's work...

3- Yahoo is still there for him ...

Gottfried



To: muzosi who wrote (60773)10/29/2001 8:41:51 AM
From: TGPTNDRRespond to of 275872
 
muzosi, Re: <...why bother ? ...>

No bother. Why should I have to put that thing on Ignore. Why should 50% of the posts on this thread at times come from current and x-Intel employees.

There are plenty of other places for Paul to blab away. He can go to the original AMD thread, for example, where he posted obnoxiously and often until this thread was started.

tgptndr



To: muzosi who wrote (60773)10/29/2001 11:40:04 AM
From: Tony ViolaRespond to of 275872
 
Muzosi,

i think it is just stupid to suspend paul. why bother ? what purpose is it going to serve other than to give him the right to claim that "we can't handle the truth" ? if people claim that he is somehow disturbing the thread, they can put him on ignore, not read his messages and not post to him. let him just blab away 100 times about amd's losses. that's his problem and you can make fun of his childish behaviour when necessary. just don't give him any more reason to post more stuff.

Good for you standing up for Paul. I obviously agree with you. Removing a person who is counter to the overwhelming majority opinion on a particular thread does not seem like the right thing to do, for those that want get all the data, news, facts and opinions. I was unable to find that prediction of Paul's for an $80 million operations loss last quarter (at a time when all else were predicting about $25 million) in a reasonable period of time. However, it's there, sure as shootin'. If someone knows where it is and wants to post it, thank you. Or, if anyone PMs it to me, I'll post it again.

Tony