Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (60788)	10/29/2001 11:04:31 AM
From: SisterMaryElephant	Respond to of 275872

hmaly, <That isn't what Businessweek thinks. Read it and weep.> Since when is BusinessWeek the last word on anything? They can't even do simple math, much less analyze Intel's future.( 52% ??? ) "Intel's revenue is expected to decline 52%, from $33.7 billion in 2000 to $25.5 billion this year--the chipmaker's first revenue drop since the 1985-86 tech recession." SK

To: hmaly who wrote (60788)	10/29/2001 12:18:51 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Hmaly, <This all happened because of the price war.> Then you have nothing to worry about. If what you say is true, then AMD could have asked for nothing better than the current price war. <That isn't what Businessweek thinks. Read it and weep.> I'm weeping all right, but it's not because I think Businessweek is right. <Intel needs to refocus. Intel needs a CEO who is capable of that. Intel needs a CEO who is smart enough to know a price war will increase demand; is smart enough to know engineering is the future of Intel, not marketing; is smart enough to know the customer comes first, not after profits.> So you think Jerry "I sold, didn't you" Sanders is that man? Tenchusatsu