SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Murder Mystery: Who Killed Yale Student Suzanne Jovin? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (988)10/29/2001 4:46:23 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 1397
 
The following set of letters may or may not resemble reality:

Mysteries 'R Us
123 Dark Corner Street
Mysterville, USA

Dear Sirs,

I have this neat idea for a murder mystery. I know you'll like it!

It starts off with this pretty college student being stabbed and left for dead two miles from where she was last seen alive. Her thesis professor, who is also an intern at a local TV station, appears briefly on the evening news to give her a tribute. A reporter he once casually dated sees the interview, calls her friends at the police, and rambles on about how mean he is because he dumped her. The police grill the professor for four hours. He answers all their questions, doesn't ask for a lawyer, volunteers to take a lie detector test and give a blood sample, and gives permission for them to search his car and apartment. Here is the part that makes my novel different from the others: the police then make him the prime suspect!

In most mysteries, the police have actual evidence before they name someone a suspect. Not in mine! Even though the victim must have been driven to the crime scene they find no blood in the professor's car nor any evidence he had it cleaned. He has no suspicious cuts on his body, and no hair or fibers of his match what the police found. In most mysteries, the police interview witnesses before establishing a motive. Not in mine! Here they base their motive on what the TV reporter told them about how because she and the professor didn't hit it off it must mean he and the student didn't hit it off either. Later the police interview 150 of the victims friends and relatives and determine not only that the victim was faithful to her boyfriend but that the professor actually had a stellar reputation in his dealings with students. Oops! In most mystery novels this would bring things to a grinding halt. Not in mine! In mine the police simply decide to change the motive. They theorize the victim was mad at her professor for being a day late to comment on her thesis that he had no obligation to comment on in the first place, so he had no choice but to kill her. Bet you didn't see that one coming!

I figured before I told you the surprise ending I'd see if you were interested. I hope you understand.

Very truly yours,

Paul Stride

=====

Dear Paul,

Thank you for considering Mysteries 'R Us. While it is our policy not to turn down any author for publication, we do have certain general guidelines we like our books to follow.

Specifically, does your novel take place in the United States? We're thinking perhaps you might consider setting it in the former Soviet union. The police could be the KGB, the professor could be accused of being a spy. That sort of thing. As for the lack or evidence, that part fits in well with the new setting, but we need lots more innuendo.

Very truly yours,

Mysteries 'R Us

=====

Dear Sirs,

I'd consider changing the setting from the US to the former Soviet Union but I was never any good in history. As for the innuendo part, I've got that all figured out.

First the police will proclaim they found cat hairs they think may lead to the killer. Everyone will naturally think they found cat hair belonging to the only named suspect. The newspapers will reinforce this by putting his picture next to hers on the front page so that everyone will think this is a big breakthrough. The police of course won't tell anyone they've had the hairs for months already and that the suspect never owned a cat. When the results come back they'll just bury them. Even better, the police will get a treasure hunting club to help look for clues around the murder scene. Only instead of searching a uniform radius they'll make a bee-line directly to the suspect's house where they'll proclaim they found "forensic evidence." In most novels the police would find something that later turned out to be the murder weapon shoved down a sewer. Not mine! In mine, one of the treasure hunters will spill the beans that all that was found was a drivers manual belonging to the suspect that was looted from his car and tossed in a bush months before the murder.

Does this work for you?

Very truly yours,

Paul Stride

=====

Dear Paul,

We must admit we've never come across a story like yours. However, we fear the readers might not buy your premise that a murder investigation could be that screwed up. What about the local media?

Very truly yours,

Mysteries 'R Us

=====

Dear Sirs,

That's easy to fix. I'll just write in a part about how the head of the murder investigation got fired for withholding evidence in another murder. As for the press, investigative journalism died when Geraldo started looking for Al Capone's secret vault.

Very truly yours,

Paul Stride

=====

Dear Paul,

OK. We *have* seen the bad apple cop scenario used in a variety of other murder mysteries, but it does seem appropriate here. Without divulging your surprise ending, have you considered how to get from here to there? Is the reader ever going to be given real evidence to ponder?

Very truly yours,

Mysteries 'R Us

=====

Dear Sirs,

Of course! There's tons of real evidence to present. But unlike other novels where it comes early on in the investigation, in my book it comes years later after the university the student and professor attended hires its own private investigator. You see, the state's attorney knows it would be political hell to criticize the police investigation, so he quietly feeds everything he can to the PI.

Years later we find out that more than one person saw a suspicious tan van at the time and place of the murder. It was buried in a couple of lines in a police press release and never mentioned after that for fear it might lead to an actual arrest of someone other than the long ago named prime suspect. Then we find the victim had bought a soda very near her apartment but that the police never asked anyone in that area to come forward if they saw anything suspicious. Instead, they told the national media the victim was last seen blocks away! Lastly, we find out the police had DNA evidence that didn't match their primary suspect but they say he still can't be ruled out even though they've never had anything to rule him in! Original enough for you?

Very truly yours,

Paul Stride

=====

Dear Paul,

Yes, your novel gets more "original" with every passing day. OK, we'll publish it. An invoice is attached.

Regarding your surprise ending, care to share it now?

Very truly yours,

Mysteries 'R Us

=====

Dear Sirs,

Ah ha ha ha! Sure.

In most murder mysteries, the police have one lead here, one there, and through painstaking research they finally gather enough clues to solve the crime. In my novel, the police had everything they needed from very early on but chose to ignore it because it didn't fit the guy they named their prime suspect from virtually day one. In other words, the crime that everyone thought would never be solved for lack of evidence had plenty of it plenty early. Even funnier, we come to find out everyone surrounding the killers knew who did it, tried early on to notify the police, but no one called them back. Come to think of it, maybe I should add a few space aliens and make it into a horror story.

On second thought, never mind.

Very truly yours,

Paul Stride

=====

- Jeff



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (988)10/30/2001 10:16:15 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1397
 
Re: 10/30/01 - NY Times: DNA From Slain Yale Student Doesn't Match That of Suspect

October 30, 2001

DNA From Slain Yale Student Doesn't Match That of Suspect
By PAUL ZIELBAUER


NEW HAVEN, Oct. 29 — DNA from skin cells found under the fingernails of a Yale student murdered nearly three years ago does not match that of James Van de Velde, her former thesis adviser and the only named suspect in the case, state investigators have concluded.

But that result, they cautioned, does not mean that Mr. Van de Velde, who has consistently maintained his innocence since his name was leaked to news reporters, is any less or more under suspicion than before.

In fact, the lack of a DNA match means only that investigators are no more sure about who may have killed the student, Suzanne Jovin, than they were before the tests, said Michael Dearington, the state's attorney here who announced the test results late Friday afternoon.

"Until and unless a match is found with the DNA material mixed with Ms. Jovin's blood under the nails of her left hand," a statement from Mr. Dearington's office said, "investigators will not know whether the contributor of the material was an innocent acquaintance or a likely suspect."

Investigators are seeking voluntary DNA samples from people who knew or worked with Ms. Jovin, Mr. Dearington said, though no one can be forced by law to provide one. Several police and Fire Department workers who were near her body in the hours after the murder have already been tested, he said.

Ms. Jovin, 21, a popular and ambitious political science major from Göttingen, Germany, was a senior at Yale when she was killed in December 1998. Clues about her killer, however, are scarce. Her body was found stabbed 17 times in a prosperous neighborhood about a mile from campus. The New Haven Police Department and Mr. Dearington's office have announced no major leads in the case, and no one has ever been charged with her murder.

Virtually from the beginning, however, Mr. Van de Velde, 41, a former naval intelligence officer from Orange, Conn., has been the case's only publicly named suspect, a distinction that he said had disrupted his career and destroyed much of his personal life. After he was named a suspect, Yale canceled his international affairs and diplomacy courses and later declined to renew his teaching contract.

Mr. Van de Velde, who began working as a document analyst for the Pentagon in December 1999, was out of the country today and did not respond to an electronic message asking for comment on the DNA test results.

Though the results do little to allay the suspicion of investigators, Mr. Van de Velde should no longer be viewed as a suspect, said his lawyer, David T. Grudberg of New Haven.

"We don't know who it belongs to," Mr. Grudberg said of the DNA, "but we do know it doesn't belong to James Van de Velde. That is another reason the police must retract the destructive `suspect' label from him."

Mr. Grudberg also pointed out that on the first day Mr. Van de Velde was questioned by the New Haven police nearly three years ago, he offered to give a blood sample to the police, which would have allowed them to check his DNA against that found under Ms. Jovin's fingernails. The police declined to take any sample then, though they did after recovering the DNA from the body. They have never said what evidence they have against Mr. Van de Velde.

Much of the investigation into Ms. Jovin's murder still remains veiled in secrecy. Mr. Dearington declined to say when the DNA tests he announced Friday were performed, or when the samples were taken, saying only that the DNA found under Ms. Jovin's fingernails was from a man.

Experts cautioned against drawing any conclusions from DNA tests, regardless of whether they show a match to someone or not.

"DNA is like fingerprints," said Elaine M. Pagliaro, the acting director of the State Police Forensic Science Laboratory, which tested the sample from Ms. Jovin's body.

"If you can associate the evidence with an individual, that does not necessary prove guilt or innocence," she said. "All you are proving is an association."

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

nytimes.com