Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (60812)	10/29/2001 11:16:30 AM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Wanna, Re: <...you're using examples from the past to give a reason why he should be banned now...> I'd give examples from the future but with any luck there won't be any. Re: <As far as I can tell, since his last ban, he has not responded to a single person here using a derogatory name.> I'd say your research wasn't very 'in depth'. Message 16567298 Dear Clueless - You don't keep up with the news - or the SCHEDULED price cuts. Would you say that qualifies under any part of 'The rules are simple. No off topic post, no insults, personal attacks or name calling. You MUST be courteous to others. Everyone is welcomed.'? Re: <...he is operating within the rules of the forum now...> Yeah, Right. Re: <And after Paul, who's next? Are you going to vote out Elmer? Tony? Me? Are my views resulting in personal injury to you?> Who's next on my hit list is Yousef. Re: <Eliminating people with different posting tendencies is slowly converting the members of the thread towards the same view.> No-one has been eliminated from this thread. Paul has the opportunity to be the very first. Re: <...I think you're making a big mistake....> Could be. I think you're making a big mistake. Remmember, This isn't Paul's first. He's already been kicked off at least twice. tgptndr

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (60812)	10/29/2001 11:47:40 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

re: <He hasn't used foul language since his last ban> He said I and AMDers were bent over so Jerry Sanders could stick something in our ass. That isn't foul? Petz

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (60812)	10/29/2001 12:02:12 PM
From: Gopher Broke	Respond to of 275872

He hasn't used foul language since his last ban Not only has he consistently used Athwiper, he has taken the trouble to edit an analysts report he posted here and replace references to Athlon with Athwiper. This is not just the odd aside we are talking about.

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (60812)	10/29/2001 5:41:22 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 275872

wanna_bmw, And after Paul, who's next? Are you going to vote out Elmer? Tony? Me? Are my views resulting in personal injury to you? Actually, you may be one of the reasons Paul will get booted this time, because most posters (at least I do) want contrarian opinion, and lately, you are doing much better than Paul providing it. Unlike Paul's, your posts are in good faith, IMO, (as are posts of Tenchusatsu, Tony, John, even Elmer and Semi sometimes, so in comparison, Paul's recent posts on AMD thread have deteriorated to just noise and spam. This forced me personally to put him on ignore recently. It would be nice if there was a selective "ignore", per thread, since Paul's posts on Intel thread are still worth reading, but the impending permanent suspension will make things easier, so I can just remove the "ignore". Joe