Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (60976)	10/29/2001 10:05:45 PM
From: bacchus_ii	Respond to of 275872

RE:"I brought this up because some clown claimed Intel spent a Billion Dollars on Merced " No sir. The very original post was from Combjelly saying: "But if you take the development costs and subtract the revenues for each, you will likely find that the Hammers have cost AMD a lot less than the Itanium has cost Intel to date... " to that you shifted the thing to Nexgen rant as follow: "Add in the $860,000,000 AMD paid for the NexGEN engineers and you will have comparable expenditures." ignoring the revenue from K6. After that it continue to degrade fare away the original comb's statement. Message 16552426 Gottfried