SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ratan lal who wrote (8107)10/29/2001 7:23:10 PM
From: oconnellc  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I apologize for being ambiguous. My point was not that it is ok for us to go to war. I think you and I are probably closer to agreeing then we are to disagreeing.

I have an older brother in the Navy, and I would gladly pay a little more for oil to keep him out of a war. However, the 'American Way Of Life' was the reason we went to war. Cheap oil is a big part of that. You are right, it wouldn't hurt to be a little more honest right up front about things. Saddam wasn't all that far from having tanks in Riyadh, which would mean $4/gallon for gas and worse.

Americans like to go for drives on Sundays and fly to Vegas for weekends and buy PlayStations and oranges grown in Florida and all those things that need cheap oil. That is what we went to war for.

Now that I have cynically attacked my countries motives for going to war 10 years ago, I wonder what would have happened had we not gone to war... Saddam Hussein would be sitting on top of ~25% of the worlds known oil and he would have a few hundred billion dollars to spend on, well whatever maniacs like to spend money on (Sunday drives and Florida oranges and PlayStations, I suppose). Would the US go to war to defend Isreal from the same invasion that conquered Kuwait? Would we have ended up going to war in 1995 instead of 1991? I'm not smart enough to answer that question, I guess. At least not in front of all these people, at least one of whom is smart enough to tell me where I was wrong (heck, in 1991 I was still trying to make a good fake ID and arguing who should be on the first Dream Team with Michael Jordan).

Chris



To: ratan lal who wrote (8107)10/29/2001 10:57:56 PM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
If the desire is to have the military perform their duty, honesty is moot. If the desire is to use propaganda for the public to support the military effort, honesty is sometimes not the best policy.

But it is a good policy to utilize in a debate to reach a full understanding.