Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (61087)	10/30/2001 10:54:51 AM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 275872

Steve, "Bottom line, you asked for a single example and I gave you one. The fact that you can't accept that is your problem." Your example is flawed, and you cannot refute it. Albert posted the whole article and even outlined the part he wanted to stress. There was no false information as you want to represent it. You may disagree with Albert's interpretation of that information, presented in the same post by the way, but it does not qualify his post as "false". And again, didn't we agree that it was on Intel thread? "In fact, I can argue that this is exactly what Paul is doing (interpreting), yet Paul's interpretations bother you?" Not at all. I don't care. I am just having fun by watching how Paul is fighting like a cornered rat twisting every possible thing. I may agree that Albert's readings into the article was a bit of a stretch, but Paul's blatant downplay of Intel possible part in XP advertising campaign seems to be more wrong. I presented a set of evidences that Albert is more likely right than wrong. You, incidentally, elected to ignore that body of evidence. Are you having problem with that, or what? Just try to be honest with yourself first, that's it. - Ali