SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (78962)10/30/2001 5:59:14 PM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116972
 
I discuss concepts based upon a better model's failure and that disclosure makes you uncomfortable.

Claude Cormier is required by our laws to disclose his financial benefit in the e*gold scheme. He did not.

Until the SEC catches up with him, the unsuspecting "Vi's" on this thread and elsewhere do not have to walk into unsound virtual gold schemes uninformed.

Furthermore, if "everyone knows Claude" the original Bre-X touter, might she have asked Claude directly instead of seeking information on e*gold from the GPM thread at large and received no informative response but mine after several days?

If I recall a recent authoritarian post you spouted from your Canadian resident perch, within the last two weeks re: the need for accountability to Sect 17(a) and 17(b) of the USA 1933 Securities act...right? Just which one was it..(a) or (b) that was the required disclosure sub-section...

Oh, and before I forget, please enligthen this thread and Vi in particular why Claude is not held to the standard of integrity and accountability & disclosure...this should be good.

All your defensiveness and personal attack has done has drawn attention to the lack of credible institutional sponsorship of virtual gold schemes Claude likes to call EDC...

Give me gold/silver in my pocket and not some electronic cypher on some fractional virtual gold ownership scheme.

Your turn