Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (146321)	10/30/2001 7:53:42 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 186894

Tony, you did beat me to the punch. :) But Berrett answered the 'Droid question like any 'bee would answer it. Remove the word "compelling", and then reaffirm the superiority of Intel's platform. wanna_bmw

To: Tony Viola who wrote (146321)	10/30/2001 7:56:46 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, I know you'll beat me to it, but Paul's answer (not in quotes since this is my summary of what he said): It's interesting how competitors flaunt clock speed when they have it, and then try to disregard it when they don't. Most OEMs have seen through this charade. Edit: The question was relating to AMD's comments about clock frequency not mattering. Otellini's response also said that Pentium 4, being 500MHz faster, continues to lead in most benchmarks, even older ones. AMDroid questions are abundant today. wanna_bmw