Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (7320)	11/1/2001 7:24:06 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

It is my understanding that we have been working with Pakistani intelligence, and moving to secure the nuclear facilities, in cooperation with the government. If I am mistaken, I would be glad to read up on it. Could you help me with a URL or two? I'm not positive what you're even asking for here. Yes, we're working with Pakistani intelligence ... which is possibly how the Taliban found Haq. I've heard as well that we are "securing nuclear facilities" and have absolutely no idea what that means. I doubt if it means that we're removing the weapons out of Pakistan. Which means they are still at risk. I think it's a toss of the coin how much or how long the Pakistani Intelligence Service will support the current government. There was on article in the LA Times on it, but I haven't been able to find it this morning. But here's some recent stories covering the ground. latimes.com latimes.com latimes.com latimes.com BTW. IMO, I think that the LA Times and Washington Post have had the best coverage on the 'war'....It pains me to say this...but Andrew Sullivan has also said that the Washington Post coverage has been very good...on the 'war'. jttmab