SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (18612)10/31/2001 10:21:37 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Assuming bc is onto something (and shorts are getting clubbed here so far....I should have known: a friend of mine who rarely plays in market called me yesterday, asking what to short...definite bail signal)..

Anyway, how would one label this if "C" started yesterday. I thought the up from COMP 1746 was overlapping, and therefore disqualified as a 1 of any kind...therefore, making such a count difficult (if not impossible)



To: AllansAlias who wrote (18612)10/31/2001 10:22:48 AM
From: Doo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
Take a gander at the 30yr. bond chart if you have a minute. ;)



To: AllansAlias who wrote (18612)10/31/2001 10:23:00 AM
From: John Madarasz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
If this h/s sets up on the ndx daily like i think it will, should measure back down to lows of 1100 or so, max wedge meas.

re-trace lows should tell the story,

a lot of very shabby bases set up off those lows, much weaker than last April's...could mean a quicker fall



To: AllansAlias who wrote (18612)10/31/2001 10:28:24 AM
From: Chip McVickar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
AA,

I'm concerned as well that the whole package of stimulous required after the WTC event will present some serious problems, but there was no other choice.

Also expecting more terrorism to change the investing landscape.