Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (198284)	10/31/2001 4:40:08 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

Attorney General John Ascroft has continued to stonewall on the issue -- raising serious questions about whether his long-time loyalty to the anti-abortion Right and the G.O.P. religious Right takes precedence over his loyalty to the nation. More crap. Imagine the AG not declaring certain suspects guilty without having all the evidence. Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!!!!..... The HORROR!!! JLA

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (198284)	10/31/2001 4:42:49 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

There is no terrorist wing of the Republican Party.

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (198284)	10/31/2001 6:32:33 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Nice twist on the story flapjack. Your attempt to spin your hatred is despicable (or is it the mediawhores who spin it?). Here's a key to the story that refutes the headline: "The FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service are considering a wide range of domestic possibilities, including associates of right-wing hate groups and U.S. residents sympathetic to the causes of Islamic extremists. But investigators have no clear suspects, and are not even certain whether there are other undetected letters that contained the deadly microbe." This paragraph says it could be either the left or the right, and more importantly the "investigators have no clear suspects". I would respect you a lot more if you posted articles like the WP piece (it is interesting) and commented on what you thought. When you spin it to match your views your credibility goes in the crapper.