SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Adams who wrote (3374)11/1/2001 10:38:34 PM
From: ahhahaRespond to of 24758
 
As much as possible, I try to avoid value judgements.

You can't help but make a continuing and endless set of value judgements. What's so bad about that? In fact, it's critical to do so in order to survive.

Reminds me of the story of the chinese magistrate, who was gifted a horse, which threw his son, breaking his son's leg, which prevented the son from participating in battle, and so on... Is that a good thing or bad thing? can be asked at each stage of the story.

Value judgements are relative. That doesn't mean they aren't of value. Is that a tautology?

In circumstances where one tries to apply the imperative, as in the story of the Chinese magistrate, then all sorts of nonsense issues forth. You always can spot the imperative by its verbial conditional usually a word ending with "ould".

Are you implying that closely held corporations should be taxed differently than public ones because the ownership is to a small group of people rather than the large numbers of fractional ownership that exists in a public company?

I can't find the difference that you would like to assert.

No.

"Closely held" has no taxing consequence.

If you are, why?

"Closely held" has no taxing consequence.

If I start a corporation with money from an inheritance or one from the capital markets are these two enterprises necessarily different?

Yes.

If I sell one corp and start another with that money is that worse than putting that money into publicly traded stock?

Possibly, but in general, no.

If I start a corporation to manage my vast wealth is that different than starting a corporation to manage others wealth?

Definitely. That's why different corporate forms mentioned elsewhere in this thread are available.

If you were to start a corp to manage your wealth, you would need to be careful of the Personal Holding Corp status, which would result in all corporate income (investment gains) being taxed at the highest marginal income tax rate.

At least and you'd have to comply with a 100 other obscurities. It's for this reason especially in the state of California (what I consider to be a socialist state) that corporations formed by individuals as they did in the '60s, rarely occurs.