SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (61801)11/2/2001 3:25:57 PM
From: Road WalkerRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe and Andreas,

re: Intel is lying

And Model Hurtz is truth enhancement?

John



To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (61801)11/2/2001 3:29:55 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Andreas, you might want to question Intel's hardware setup, rather than accusing them of lying. Most of the current Athlon XP reviews are on the "cream of the crop" KT266A based boards. Intel might be testing with what they consider to be the most "mainstream" components for AMD, such as a board based on the AMD760 chipset. With 760 based boards, along with memory with relaxed timings (2-3-3 DDR266, for example) I bet the 2GHz Pentium 4 would outperform the Athlon XP on quite a few benchmarks. Also, what Intel considers "old" is very subjective, and could mean almost anything.

wanna_bmw



To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (61801)11/2/2001 3:36:33 PM
From: dale_laroyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
>Otellini claimed that a 2 GHz Pentium 4 is the fastest processor around -- even in many "old" applications.<

I would consider several dozen to be many. And, I am sure that out of the thousands of old applications at least several dozen run faster on P4. So I believe Otellini is correct.