Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (8662)	11/2/2001 9:00:00 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

That being said, in Chomsky's case, I think he deserves what Horowitz is dishing out. Anyone who can possibly equate Clinton's bombing an empty Sudanese factory with the WTC attacks, and not only equate them, but actually say the Sudanese attack was worse, has clearly gone way off the deep end. I would love to argue this point with you, Nadine. You do tend to take half a point and make it the whole point. It would be fun to track it all done and go back and forth with you. I suspect, in fact, if all that were placed in context, what Chomsky said would not be quite so bad. But I don't care enough about the outcome to spend the time. Arguing with you, or anyone else for that matter, in which the point is who does the proper exegesis of Chomsky, is not my idea of a way to learn how to rethink global conflict right now. John