SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (61875)11/2/2001 6:10:37 PM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
One mans "questionable labeling practice" is another mans lie.

It is an enormous stretch to call it a lie. For a statement to be a lie it has to be factually untrue and the person making it has to know it is untrue. The name "Athlon XP 1800+" does not make any statement of fact that can be true or false, it's just a name. AMD does make statements about the chip that can be true or false, but 1 - I would say they are true or mostly so, if anything they are conservative statements, and 2 - Those statements are not part of the name. From any reasonable perspective the name is not a lie. You can argue that AMD is lying when they say that an XP 1800+ runs as fast or faster then a P4 1800mhz, but I don't think it would be easy to make a strong case in favor of that idea.

Tim



To: Road Walker who wrote (61875)11/2/2001 10:25:19 PM
From: eCoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
John:One mans "questionable labeling practice" is another mans lie.

A lie in this context implies some sort of misrepresentation, does it not? What is being misrepresented here? MHz? Is MHz the be all to end all when consumers purchase a cpu? Is the consumer being suckered into a cpu purchase that they will regret?

You know the answers to these questions. Give it up.

eCo