Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (8718)	11/2/2001 9:58:56 PM
From: spiral3	Respond to of 281500

bbm, in an edit I added "my take" as the last line of my previous post. Sinisterism has it's limits I agree, and it's opposite, or should that be "the back to it's front", is what could save the world. Thankfully, early on I escaped corporate bureaucracy. Although I now run a company, it’s a little different on this side of the fence <g> sweet dreams

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (8718)	11/3/2001 9:25:06 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm always inclined to view the appearance of disorganized, slightly hapless ineffectiveness as evidence of disorganized, slightly hapless ineffectiveness, before I start looking elsewhere for darker explanations. Hi, Bland. As someone who spent a career in the Federal bureaucracy, much of it doing management studies, I heartily concur. The notion that these anomalies at the operational levels are anything but "disorganized, slightly hapless ineffectiveness" is so unlikely it's risible. At the political levels, however,... When divining conspiracies, it's important to differentiate. Karen