Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (61956)	11/3/2001 6:28:17 AM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Paul Re: < No - the 0.13 Micron Pentium /// Server chip should be around for a VERY LONG time - for low power blade servers all the way up to 8-way SMP servers with large L2 cache. The Pentium 4 XEON version will coexist and fit into its own market niches where very high speed is required along with HyperThreading technology.> To me that makes sense -- it's what I've been thinking for 6 months. Is this a new position for Intel -- or did I read Intels position on the P-III wrong last summer and through third Quarter? From the Q3 CC. <Eric Ramsdeutch>Hi, thank you, can you give me an idea of when you expect to stop shipments of Pentium 3 all together, not Celerons with the Pentium 3 branded name and Paul, you mentioned that still expect to meet your 2001 goal for Pentium 4 shipments, can you refresh my memory and give me an idea of what the units were with that. <Paul>On the Pentium 3, Eric, the likely life of that product after it finishes the desktop and notebook businesses is it will move into the embedded space so we will be shipping a product in that brand name for sometime in our networking and embedded controller areas. But from a PC perspective, you will see in notebooks products lasting through next year. In terms of the original goals, I almost wish I had not said that because I don't think we have ever made that number public although a number of you suggested that we had a goal that we never argued with. Thanks for the response. tgptndr