Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dale_laroy who wrote (62170)	11/5/2001 11:03:45 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

"Might I at least suggest that, in the event of a lifetime ban, the technique of routinely posting links to Paul's increasing rare on this thread significant contributions on the Intel thread be used by some reasonably responsible poster, such as Tench." Why don't you go and enjoy their "significant contributions" directly on Intel thread? What prevents you from doing so? "..such as Hammer or perhaps Barton being officially announced is reached. Actually, some other milestone, such as Intel actually shipping either a mobile P4 or Banias would be better, since AMD's potential failure to ship the target processor would result in a permanent ban, which would be unfair to Paul with his negativity with regards to AMD, which would in this case be justified." Excuse me? How possibly all these "milestones" are related to the topic of Paul's outrageous and disrespectful behaviour? Even if he is thousand times right with regard to some milestone, so what? There is nothing "unfair" with regard to Paul. His blatant hate and disrespect of AMD supporters has no justification. The thread should be freed from the terrorist-like behavior of Paul. - Ali

To: dale_laroy who wrote (62170)	11/5/2001 1:15:23 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "I would prefer that Paul be banned until some milestone, such as Hammer or perhaps Barton being officially announced is reached. " That may effectively be a lifetime ban !

To: dale_laroy who wrote (62170)	11/5/2001 1:17:26 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 275872

Dale, would prefer that Paul be banned until some milestone, such as Hammer or perhaps Barton being officially announced is reached. That long <g> I think the double length of the last suspension would be an appropriate time, if that was an option, which it is not. Joe

To: dale_laroy who wrote (62170)	11/5/2001 1:26:19 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 275872

I would prefer that Paul be banned until some milestone, such as Hammer or perhaps Barton being officially announced is reached. Actually, some other milestone, such as Intel actually shipping either a mobile P4 or Banias would be better, since AMD's potential failure to ship the target processor would result in a permanent ban, which would be unfair to Paul with his negativity with regards to AMD, which would in this case be justified. Might I at least suggest that, in the event of a lifetime ban, the technique of routinely posting links to Paul's increasing rare on this thread significant contributions on the Intel thread be used by some reasonably responsible poster, such as Tench. Dale, you make me laugh sometimes. There are a few people that post ad nauseum here that have, to me, never contributed anything. Their continuing presence is not questioned however. The "Get out of Jail Free" pass that goes with the AMD backer status (unless they go way over the line) makes some think they walk on water or something.