SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (9004)11/5/2001 12:50:57 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Credible enough for the Green Party to put it on their web site. greenparty.org

Apparently not credible enough for anybody to pick up the story, though. Something's going on here, one way or the other. Given that the Green Party has a certain level of national legitimacy, my gut feeling is that they didn't make this up. I remember stories from the Central American peace movement in the '80s that I disbelieved at the time, that turned out to be true. We'll see, or maybe more frighteningly, we won't.



To: KyrosL who wrote (9004)11/5/2001 1:42:15 PM
From: E  Respond to of 281500
 
Unfortunately, I find it credible, though of course there will be another side presented, and it will suggest that she is a terrorist threat of some sort, probably as an "eco-terrorist," since she's Green Party.

But then I believe that establishments will do anything they can get away with to suppress dissent, and that includes labeling it terrorism. (There is actual terrorism being machinated at this moment in our country, and we have, as I have said, long been naive on this score. But power corrupts, and the U.S.A. Patriot Act gives much power that will, inevitably, be corrupted into dissent-suppression.)