Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (62281)	11/5/2001 3:42:57 PM
From: jcholewa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Guys, guys, calm down a bit. You both have valid points. Kap, Intel is perhaps not as forthcoming as they should be with their microarchitecture. Wanna, it could be considered FUD to bring so much attention to a clock domain that affects a minority of silicon area. Your comments are not mutually exclusive, so you don't have to yell at each other. ^_^

To: kapkan4u who wrote (62281)	11/5/2001 3:46:55 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

"You are full of sht wanna"* "You chose to be a weasel" If this thread moderated, or not? John

To: kapkan4u who wrote (62281)	11/5/2001 3:46:58 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 275872

Kapkan, Re: "You are full of sh*t wanna and you know it. Either decoder runs at half the clock of the P4 core or it doesn't. You should have showed some class and just admitted such when you learned about it. You chose to be a weasel instead. Its too late now." Try to compose yourself, you're beginning to insert that foot of yours again. Like I said, the documentation doesn't necessarily state one way or another, but you asserted it earlier as one particular way, and you offered no proof. Therefore, you are weaseling out of your spin-doctoring FUD-fest. How can you type in these lies? wanna_bmw