Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (62303)	11/5/2001 6:18:46 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

bmw re: re: Amd always specify that their rating is not frequency wrong again. until recently, amd always specified the frequency of their chips. until recently it was frequency unless you are going to bring up an ancient history Regards -Albert ps btw why are making an argument since you already stated that it is not worth your while arguing with me :-))

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (62303)	11/5/2001 6:23:05 PM
From: fyodor_	Respond to of 275872

Wanna: Albert: Amd always specify that their rating is not frequency wrong again. You: until recently, amd always specified the frequency of their chips. Albert: but I have never seen disclaimer from intel about decoder speed You: neither has anybody else outside of Intel, I imagine. Albert: decoder speed been slower than the quoted number. You: didn't you just mention that there is no quoted number? You: Ok, Albert, it's time for you to ease off the pipe and make some sense for a change. I think you need to pause and reread Albert's comments. While I'm sure you disagree with them, you clearly misunderstood several of his comments quoted above. It might be Albert's English that throws you off (sorry, Albert, I don't mean any offense). -fyo