SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (19537)11/6/2001 10:55:00 AM
From: Jack of All Trades  Respond to of 209892
 
Thanks... I should have time to update some forks later today...



To: Shack who wrote (19537)11/6/2001 10:55:04 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
I'll say we print a marginal high (vis a vis) here shortly and then fade. That would be you're 'b' top and would allow the S&P to climb some in its pattern -- I think it needs to.

I'm in the weeds still. I promised myself I wouldn't bother with this jello. It whipped me around at the end of last week and I won't let that happen again without a fight.



To: Shack who wrote (19537)11/6/2001 10:55:26 AM
From: UnBelievable  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 209892
 
If Fed Cuts .50 Federal Funds Would Be 2%

A rate last seen about 40 years ago in 1961.

Does anyone know what the lowest Federal Funds has ever been and when that was?

For extra credit: If the Fed does cut by .50 how much more in total will they be able to cut if the economy still continues to flounder.

For more extra credit: What do you say when you are out of bullets and the enemy keeps coming?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News