Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BillyG who wrote (79603)	11/6/2001 5:50:13 PM
From: J Krnjeu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 93625

Hello BiilyG, Actually, you are full of it. Rambus patents that predated JEDEC where ruled not applicable because the judge went against the "INDUSTRY ACCEPTED TERMOLOGY" and redefined the definition of BUS to what he wanted. This the only way that the judge could get results that IFX wanted. In every court case where an industry expert was used, the defendents where found to violate the patents. Italy, they used an expert and MU was found to have violated RAMBUS patents. Hitachi case had an expert and their lawyers told them to settle. That is why the appeals court in an IP case is a special one where they use industry accepted terms to mean just that, not ones made up to suit a judge. I really suggest you read the court papers. You will learn a great deal about the case. Thank You JK