Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:27:18 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "I can not recall giving amd credit for hammer. Would you be kind enough to point to the post, I'd be forever in your debt :-))" Sure. You just hang on - I'm looking it up now !

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:31:16 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Message 16564203 To:Tenchusatsu who wrote (60465) From: albert kovalyov Friday, Oct 26, 2001 1:56 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 62418 Ten I knew that and I was talking about fallback plan. BTW did not Microsoft announce that they would support hammer? Regards -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:33:12 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Message 16530880 To:wanna_bmw who wrote (145726) From: albert kovalyov Friday, Oct 19, 2001 4:08 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 146986 bmw re: I can hardly blame them for that. no one blaming anyone here. We are talking about increasing capacity re: Let me straighten things out for you. I'd appreciate it very much re: AMD plans to have significantly more volumes of .13u parts than .18u parts amd is going from a 2 cpu fabs to 1 and plus hammers are going to be larger than athlons and it is not now but in the future. re: even if they have to stuff most of their shipments Is that an official data that I have missed re: to stuff the market full of CPUs wait a sec, are you are not saying - don't touch the market it belongs to intel. re: just to produce the same volumes would not that contradict the fact that intel gained .7% of market share I know that we are all biased one way or another but don't you think that you stretching it Regards -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:34:32 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Message 16276340 To:wanna_bmw who wrote (53043) From: albert kovalyov Wednesday, Aug 29, 2001 5:27 PM View Replies (3) \| Respond to of 62421 bmw re: If AMD goes ahead with using model numbers to confuse the consumer into buying their product, then they are the deceptive ones. while I am not thrilled that amd is devising model scheme I do not see it as deceptive. Intel call "2 GHz" as speed of the processor and that is really deceptive. Hz is a frequency measure and speed is usually understood as performance characteristics. p4-1Ghz and athlon mp 1Ghz are not the processors of the same speed but the processors that operate at the same frequency. I have not heard Otellini's speech but if it states what you said then Otellini seems to have no problem lying to people re: Paul Otellini spoke for a long time on getting computers "beyond megahertz" could it be because hammer is going to operate at much higher frequency than Itanium? Regards -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:36:14 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Message 16220430 To:jcholewa who wrote (51405) From: albert kovalyov Thursday, Aug 16, 2001 2:28 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 62423 JC barrett stated clearly stated his goal to regain lost market share. Even with 100% control over commercial and mobile (recently changed) sectors intel was loosing market share to amd. Barrett said that the price cuts would stimulate the market but the reality is that decrease in price of the chip is marginal as compared to the price of the system and (economics 101)market would absorb just as much as it would be willing to absorb. Hence the price cuts is to regain market share. Now consider how much intel is cutting to add few % to their market share and you will see that it is less than optimal assuming that products would stay as they are and demand is irrelevant for that consideration. AMD's new product line include chip designed for commercial use and mobile markets. Power consumption of mobile athlon is only 25% higher than pIII while pIII is on .13. If amd would manage to hold on to OEMs (lost few already) and market share then mid next year we might see a lot of hammers in desktops. But Barrett said that he wants to stimulate the market regardless the stats that show his action as slowing the market. I believe him, don't you. Regards -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:38:09 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Message 16266761 To:Mani Ahmadi who started this subject From: albert kovalyov Monday, Aug 27, 2001 7:58 PM Respond to of 62425 October 15 is a date when amd would finally talk about hammer techmarket.ru Regards -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:39:49 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "I can not recall giving amd credit for hammer. Would you be kind enough to point to the post, I'd be forever in your debt :-))" Message 15911177 To:fingolfen who wrote (136941) From: albert kovalyov Thursday, Jun 7, 2001 5:55 PM Respond to of 146986 fingolfen re: AMD is having trouble staying competitive frequency wise I buy my computers based on how fast they run my programs and not how fast their respective cpu clocks may oscillate. If you promise to be consistent then I'll agree with that the clock is more important than performance that is ia-64 is going be hammered by hammer because it's clock would oscillate much faster <gggg> Regards ? -Albert

To: AK2004 who wrote (62412)	11/6/2001 4:40:50 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "I can not recall giving amd credit for hammer. Would you be kind enough to point to the post, I'd be forever in your debt :-))" Message 15778621 To:andreas_wonisch who wrote (38733) From: albert kovalyov Wednesday, May 9, 2001 5:34 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 62428 Andreas <edited> cool, cnet pointed to something that we have not considered and that is mobile brand. Both companies would have desktop #4 but only amd would have mobile #4. I am sold on athlon 4. And by the time intel 4 would find its way into notebooks amd desktops should see hammer family. I withdraw my proposal for athlon xp <ggg> Regards -Albert