Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (21520)	11/6/2001 6:46:43 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22053

Gulp. I stand corrected on "a couple of states", now it's nine. "The parties intending to continue legal action include nine states - Iowa, Connecticut, California, Massachusetts, Florida, Kansas, Utah, Minnesota, and West Virginia - as well as Washington, D.C. "Our intention is to proceed in the litigation," (Connecticut AG) Blumenthal said. "I believe this (federal) agreement reflects very good progress, but it may not be good enough to protect consumers against misuse of monopoly, or recurrence of violations of law." money.cnn.com Guess the one settlement wasn't messily protracted enough. Maybe they're cheaper by the dozen.