SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4247)11/7/2001 3:52:23 AM
From: frankw1900  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
Sure, I've been using this engine the same as the Google users,

alltheweb.com ,

because it's intuitive and faster than hell. Just type the name.

There is an extra advantage - if it's a large, complex site, I might get exactly the page I'm looking for in the first ten hits, Eg:

alltheweb.com

Or, if I'm not sure where I want to start, I can do something like this:

alltheweb.com ,

sort of like being in a library reading room.

Also, I like using Netscape, (because I can get direct internet connection) but its Bookmarks engine is wretched because I have to alphabetize by hand, so I don't want the bookmarks file to become too big.

KISS KISS KISS



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4247)11/7/2001 10:54:32 AM
From: RAT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
One thing I didn't see in the article was Google's caching of web pages. I believe that they cache all pages that the web crawler encounters. I don't know what their normal cache pattern is, but if fast enough, users could have gotten a view of CNN even when its own servers reached capacity.

To see it - do a search in Google and click on the word "cache". You should see an older page presented.