Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (62642)	11/7/2001 2:38:22 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Milo <edited> if nothing else works for intel then why not change accounting rules :-)) Message 16622358 Regards -Albert <edited> I liked that part "impact of FAS 142 and hasn't yet determined the full effects these statements will have on its consolidated financial position" I mistakenly thought that financial position does not depend on accounting rules :-)) but as always I was wrong and the part " Intel Corp. (INTC) expects its net income to increase by about $1.5 billion for 2002 as a result of the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard 142. now the question is if intel would manage to get above 1.5B income in q4

To: milo_morai who wrote (62642)	11/7/2001 3:30:08 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 275872

Milo, Re: "AMD's marketshare is as large as it has ever been, and you know INTC will continue to lose share next year. INTC is going to have to close down some FAB's soon will all that extra capicity. Time to face the reality of a world wide recession and dust of the resume'. INTC is very fat with personal, to the tune of 20,000." Thanks for proving that you are, in fact, an AMDroid with fancy delusions, no fundamentals, and a lack of touch with reality. wanna_bmw

To: milo_morai who wrote (62642)	11/7/2001 4:13:29 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "INTC is very fat with personal, to the tune of 20,000." I don't recall you expressing any CONCERN when AMD laid off 15% off their employees.