Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (62763)	11/8/2001 5:28:03 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Dan3 Re...But palomino completely dominates P4 in terms of performance, AMD's core market knows and appreciates that fact, and AMD will be in fine shape to ramp Hammer next year.<<<<<<<<< Good post; but I would like to make another point.. As Hammer goes from 32 to 64 bits; a lot of people will expect that the IPC will also improve. They will say say, Of course this chip does more per clock, it is 64 bits, rather than 32. Which will fit in nicely into the fact that the Hammer could have almost 60% improvement in IPC over P4. So when AMD says that a 2 ghz Hammer will = a 3 ghz P4, people will yes, that makes sense, Hammer can process 64 bits per clock, instead of 32, so that is the reason Hammer is so much faster. People will equate higher performance to the 64 bit part and expect more performance; and as a consequence, will compare the higher ghz P4 against higher IPC Hammer, and say, Hammer doubles the processing power, but P4 only has 30% more speed, so therefore, Hammer is a better buy. In other words, I fully expect that AMDs Quantispeed rating, or TPI will be more believeable, once Hammer appears.